Monday, May 13, 2013

Blogging Around

While looking at blogs, I was excited to read the Dialectics prompt, probably because I had so much fun with it. I read a few different responses, but the one that sparked the most interest in me was Laila's. She compared restriction and freedom, and it immediately reminded me of religion. Many people have different views on religion, and one of these contradicting beliefs is whether it restricts or frees you.

Laila,
Your paragraph describing restriction reminded me a lot of the idea of fate and that God or some other all-powerful being as a path laid out for you. You still have "choices" within that path, but in the end you will end up in the same place. Many religions believe that, and to me that is the easy way out. It allows people to sit back and anything happen because they believe that no matter what they do, they'll end up in the same place anyways. It completely aggravates me. But, as you further pointed out, what if we were living in a world where our choices were made for us but we were under the illusion that we were in control? Then I agree with you, that it is not restriction because we are not seeing ourselves as being restricted. If in this life we are set on a path by some divine being and don't have control over our future but all the while believe that we do, I don't believe that we are truly being restricted. But once you sit back and let everything fly pass you because you believe you'll end up in the same place, then you become restricted.

After looking at a few more blogs and prompts, I found that the Dialectics prompt was the one that sparked my interest the most. Eliana's entry was interesting, in which she compared the ideas of bliss and darkness.

Eliana,
After reading your blog, I realized that it hit an idea that I was struggling with in my head but wasn't able to fully comprehend it. And now, after reading Laila's response as well, I feel as if I am slightly repeating what has been said by both of you. But oh, well. After watching the Matrix, I found myself trying to figure out which world I'd rather be in: simulated or real? The immediate answer should be real for most people, because that seems to be the correct world to desire. That's what all of the good people in the movie go for. But Neo seems extremely miserable once he's pulled out of the Matrix. To be fair, we don't know if he was always so sad, but to me it seemed like he wasn't having a great time. Personally, I would be with Eliana, Laila, and Cypher. I honestly believe that I would be happier living in my blissful fantasy world. If I was pulled into the real world, I wouldn't be able to handle it. So I somewhat agree with Eliana's claim that the real world is blissful, but the people living in it don't seem too happy. To me, the happier people are the ones who stay in the Matrix.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Dialectics: The Matrix Is and Isn't Possible

Before we began watching the Matrix, I was nervous. I have the tendency to get ideas that scare me (such as the possibility of the Matrix) stuck in my head and it's hard to get rid of them. I was afraid that I would become convinced that I was stuck in the Matrix. But, I sucked it up. And I'm glad I did because The Matrix is an amazing movie.

The idea that provoked me the most, and I'm sure many others, is the idea of whether or not the Matrix itself is even possible. On the surface, it's easy to say yes. We could be in the Matrix right now and have no idea. It's also easy to say no, because that is completely ridiculous and highly improbable. But, by being the devil's advocate, we can come back and say just because it's improbable doesn't mean it's impossible.

I began believing that yes, the Matrix is indeed possible. It could have just been the paranoia in me leading to this conclusion, but I did take this idea into consideration. We could never know, unless approached by Morpheus, whether or not we were in the Matrix. Isn't that the whole idea? To believe so thoroughly in it that it becomes your reality? That idea is what freaks me out. What if everything I believe to be real right now really isn't?

But that brings me to the side of the Matrix being impossible. It's difficult to comprehend the idea that everything you have learned and experienced is just a figment of your imagination. Or, rather, being fed into your imagination through a machine. We all put so much trust into our memories and experiences, fully believing in everything, that it would be almost impossible for us to turn around and realize that no, it wasn't real. 

But let's say for a second that the Matrix is real (as in we are inside the Matrix right now). Does that mean that all of our experiences and memories aren't real? What makes a memory real? A memory or experience is created by the brain, and even though our memories would've been given to us, wouldn't they still be stored away in the same way and place that every other real memory would be put? If the Matrix were to be real, and we were all inside of it, I do not believe that it would undermine every experience we have lived through. Just because we haven't seen it or touched it with our actual body, our mind is still given the electric impulses it would've been given if it had seen or touched this thing. So doesn't that make it as real as anything else?

In the end, I do not believe that we are in the Matrix. It's extremely difficult to believe, so much so that I find it so improbable that it's most likely not true (see I'm not saying impossible). But, if we just so happened to be in the Matrix right now, I do not think that my life, or anyone else's, would be considered a lie. Sure, we didn't experience anything with our full consciousness, but our brain treated everything as if we did. And that is what controls our memories, thoughts, experiences, everything; the brain. So if the brain believes it, so do we.  

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Metacognition: Jane Eyre Mash-Up

When we were first assigned this project, I was a little confused. I found it hard to understand how we could incorporate different materials and sources while still keeping "one voice." After talking it through with Laila and Kira, my group mates, I began to understand and got excited. We chose the theme of independence to stay away from the major theme of love that runs throughout Jane Eyre but still keep an important idea. We then split up to find our evidence and quotes that we would then group together to make into one flowing idea.

For me, finding the quotes within Jane Eyre was the most restricting. I knew that the idea of independence was everywhere, but it was hard to find fifteen different passage that expressed it. Some passages worked within the story, but if they were pulled out of context they wouldn't make sense. Eventually, though, we found each of our passages. I felt the same way about finding quotes from other sources within the curriculum. I felt very limited, and it took some time to find passages that would work. We did find these as well, but it wasn't as easy as I would have expected.

I enjoyed finding outside elements much more because I felt more free. After thinking about this, I realized that when it comes to bringing different elements into one idea, I enjoy freedom. Usually I'm okay with restrictions, because it helps me know what the teacher wants, but for this kind of project I liked having a wide range of elements to choose from. I believe it allowed me to be more creative with this project and share my knowledge from many different places, not just what we studied in English. It was easier coming up with connections from outside the English curriculum because they were the ideas that came quick and naturally to me, the ideas that popped up into my head when someone said "independence," instead of being forced or looked for. I do believe that it's good for me to find connections in everything, but I had more difficulty with this project when I was told where to look for these connections.

I like the fact that I was comfortable with the free aspect of this assignment. Usually the open-ended part of assignments makes me nervous, so it was a nice change to feel confident in my ideas. I wish I had an easier time understanding this assignment originally, though, because if it had been individual I would've had difficulty. In the end I really liked this assignment. It definitely brought together many different elements and ideas that I never thought could've been brought together.

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Metacognition: Short Story Writing

Writing my short story was a fun yet frustrating process. It gave me the opportunity to be free and creative with my writing, but it involved changing my story many times to make it just right. In the end, I know that the changes were for the better.

I began with an idea which, I admit, was pretty unrealistic. But I liked it, so I went with it. After receiving feedback from Mr. Allen, I realized that my plot was so unrealistic to the point where the reader would have a hard time enjoying the story because it would sound ridiculous. I then reread my story, or the story fragment I had written at the time, and kept the parts that I believed were good enough to be rewritten.

I then took those parts, my main character's poor relationship with his wife being my main "pressure," and twisted them around so the story would be slightly different and more believable, but I didn't have to change it completely. I was much happier with this story and thought I would definitely be successful. I was wrong. In this story, the main character's wife died. In my feedback, Mr. Allen commented that her death sounded forced and I should somehow tweak it. I was frustrated with this, that was the biggest push on my main character and I was proud of it, but I knew that he was probably right. I just believed I had a good idea going for me.

I talked to my mom about my story and tossed some ideas around with her. I realized that I had had the idea of the wife dying stuck in my head and it was hard to imagine anything else happening, so it was good to have a fresh mind help me with new ideas and scenarios. We had the idea of the wife going into a coma instead. That way, my story would be more dramatic and pressure would still be put on my main character, but the wife didn't die, so it wouldn't be as much of a stretch.

From doing this project, I learned that if I get an idea in my head for writing, it gets stuck there. I have difficulty seeing my story go any other way, so if I need to change my story, I have to get inspiration from somewhere else. That doesn't mean I take the idea from someone or something, but I may get a flash of inspiration from an outside source. I wish I wasn't like that, though. It makes writing much more difficult because I get stuck in one section of my imagination, as opposed to imagining all different things and choosing my best idea. I like the fact that after taking a break, looking at something else, and coming back, I usually have a more open mind. And although that's an extra step I'd like to take, it's worth it in the long run.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Change of Mind: Details Matter

Recent activities and discussions in class have shown me how much thought actually goes into creative writing, whether a short story or a movie. I never thought that it was easy or came right to you, but the discussions in class and the process of writing a short story have shown me that there's a lot more to it then coming up with a good plot line; the little details in the writing matter a lot.

Reading "Stone Boy" and discussing it afterwards helped me pick out the details in writing. I remember when I first read "Stone Boy" at home before any discussion, I really liked it but only saw the main plot or the top layer. The next day, we discussed it in class and it opened my eyes to how much more detail and ideas you can get from the story if you look deeper into the writing. I never would've noticed how uncomfortable the main character was having control over his older brother or exactly how much pressure was being put upon him if we didn't talk about it. I am currently reading The Constant Princess by myself for some extra reading, and these discussions have helped me pick up so much more from the book.

The process of story writing has also helped me appreciate the technique of word usage and little details much more. Mr. Allen said that verbs can be powerful if you use the right one, and I've found that this is definitely true. One word can say so much, and if you can pick up on that while reading a story, it will tell you so much more about what is going on that any amount of dialogue can.

We watched a clip of the movie "Apocalypse Now" in class, and the discussion of the film technique introduced me to how much you can learn from the small details that most people wouldn't pay attention to. We touched on the noises in the background and the gun underneath the main characters pillow; things that I normally wouldn't think much of. The discussion showed me how much these little things mean and how much you can learn about the character just from the placement of his gun. A couple weeks ago I was watching "Cool Hand Luke" with my dad and I remember saying, "My English teacher is getting into my head!" I noticed the acts of repetition or the hidden messages in the movie that I wouldn't have noticed before and it drove me crazy! I admit, at first I wanted to write off what we learned in class and assume I would never use it in my everyday life, but I did, and I loved it. It made the film mean so much more by finding these little details. I had to admit to myself that details do matter, whether writing or reading a story, and they'll bring so much more to the story than you would've thought.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Best of Today: Europe is in Darkness

Today in class, we had a discussion on Heart of Darkness. There were many good points, but the idea that got my attention the most was one from Anna B. She pointed out that although Africa, and specifically the Congo, and always referred to as the "darkness," when Marlow returns to Europe he believes the people living there to be the ones in the dark. It's the complete opposite of how you'd think it would be.

Africa has always been looked at as being behind other civilizations and therefore unenlightened whereas Europe has always been a leading power and described specifically as enlightened. That's why this idea is so intriguing. When Marlow first returns to Europe, he says, "I had no particular desire to enlighten them, but I had some difficulty in restraining myself from laughing in their faces so full of stupid importance" (Page 71). Because Marlow has been to the end of the world and back, he realizes how in the dark the average person is. They are filled with "stupid importance" and believe that only their own lives and little worlds matter. They're the ones who need their eyes to be opened, no the natives in the Congo.

This also made me think a lot about the present day. Many people are still like this; they get sucked into their own little worlds and ignore everything that doesn't have anything to do with them. I admit, I do this on occasion as well. It's hard to focus and learn about something that you feel as no relevance to you. It's important to do this, though. I believe it helps you become a more rounded person because you are knowledgeable about many things all over the world. If a war is going on, you should know more than just who it's between. Although it may seem like it's not effecting you, it indirectly is. It's effecting trade patterns, economies, people's lives, and many more. That's the same as what was happening in Heart of Darkness. No one knew what was going on in the Congo, and no one cared. They didn't understand that everything has some relevance to you, whether it's direct or indirect.

By acknowledging this, I am now able to open my mind to other situations going on in other parts of the world. I tried to do this before, but Anna's comment opened my eyes to how in the dark many people are. If you don't understand that the whole world is connect, then you are truly in the dark.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Blogging Around

One blog post I responded to was Stephanie's "Get Organized." I chose this entry because I thought it was extremely interesting that she went to New York to perform and because she had good organization methods.

I'm so impressed that you went to New York for a concert! You may have mentioned this before, but I seem to have forgotten. Very cool. Anyways, I think it's so smart that you get everything all set up beforehand. I have the tendency to put things off until last minute and find myself scrambling around trying to find everything I need. I really need to start preparing sooner because, like you, I'm generally a nervous person and if I'm running around until the last minute, I generally feel like I'm missing something. Most nights I try to pack my backpack for school the next day, but if I forgot, the next day I'm constantly freaking out that I forgot something. I think preparing ahead of time is a good habit to have.

The other blog post I responded to was Nish's "The Poetic Walls." I chose this because I saw that he struggled in the same way I did when it came to writing poetry and I enjoyed reading how he responded to these struggles.

I had the exact same problem. At first, my poem was, as you said, just the skeleton of one, and I had a hard time finding the words to make it a real poem. I knew what I wanted to say but I had difficulty expressing it in a poetic way. It wasn't until Mr. Allen pointed out that I need to focus on the scene and the moment I'm in more. I pictured the woods I was in more thoroughly and started to write something that sounded more poetic. But I also hit that second brick wall. I put everything in that I could and Mr. Allen still asked for more. I, unfortunately, couldn't take a walk in the woods to help my thought process but instead walked away from the poem, did something else, and came back with a fresh mind.